Re: U.S. knew agent going to airport [Archivio] - www.ForumViaggiare.com

Visualizza versione completa : Re: U.S. knew agent going to airport


EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)
11-03-2005, 04.49.34
BruceB wrote:


>
> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
> alt.politics.bush.

Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
qualifies too, why not Iraq?

>
>

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

nitram
11-03-2005, 10.45.52
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:49:34 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
<evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>BruceB wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And this has WHAT do to with European travel??? I certainly don't mind you
>> being an off-topic cross-posting for no real purpose *******, but you really
>> should take your little anti-US article (or is it really?) and post it in
>> just the group that is first on the list of where you posted it,
>> alt.politics.bush.
>
>Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
>qualifies too, why not Iraq?

I agree with Bruce.
--
Martin

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.

Claim Guy
11-03-2005, 15.19.24
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d0r10602efj@news2.newsguy.com...


> Las time I looked, Italy was still in Europe, and if Turkey
> qualifies too, why not Iraq?


You might want to avoid any logic competitions, Ma'am.